<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jough.com is Jough Dempsey &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jough.com/categories/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jough.com</link>
	<description>Hi, I'm Jough Dempsey, and I make the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Best Album Review Ever</title>
		<link>http://jough.com/2005/05/07/best-album-review-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://jough.com/2005/05/07/best-album-review-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jough.com/2005/05/07/best-album-review-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A picture is worth 1,024 words:
Tiny Mix Tapes: Nine Inch Nails
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A picture is worth 1,024 words:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tinymixtapes.com/musicreviews/n/nine_inch_nails.htm">Tiny Mix Tapes: Nine Inch Nails</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jough.com/2005/05/07/best-album-review-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Listenings now Logged</title>
		<link>http://jough.com/2003/07/14/recent-listenings-now-logged/</link>
		<comments>http://jough.com/2003/07/14/recent-listenings-now-logged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jough.com/blog/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the magic of BlogAmp, a plug-in for WinAmp (or MacAmp, I&#8217;d assume) you can now view the last ten mp3 songs I&#8217;ve listened to, as long as I&#8217;m connected to the internet, with the date and time I listened to them (I don&#8217;t know why that the date and time that I listened [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the magic of <a href="http://www.geocities.com/insanitydrops/blogamp/">BlogAmp</a>, a plug-in for WinAmp (or MacAmp, I&#8217;d assume) you can now view the last ten mp3 songs I&#8217;ve listened to, as long as I&#8217;m connected to the internet, with the date and time I listened to them (I don&#8217;t know why that the date and time that I listened to a song is relevant, but there you go).</p>
<p>It also seems to add an entry each time a track is started, so multiple listings of the same title could mean either that I&#8217;ve listened to the same song more than once (which wouldn&#8217;t be out of form) or that I&#8217;ve been interrupted a lot and couldn&#8217;t get through a song.</p>
<p>In any case, it should be fun.  Like all other things blog-centric, it&#8217;s more data about your humble webmaster.</p>
<p>DISCLAIMER: Just because a song shows up in my playlist does NOT mean that I endorse the song.  I could&#8217;ve just listened to something that I disliked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jough.com/2003/07/14/recent-listenings-now-logged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hail to the Thief &#8211; New Radiohead Album Review</title>
		<link>http://jough.com/2003/04/30/hail-to-the-thief-new-radiohead-album-review/</link>
		<comments>http://jough.com/2003/04/30/hail-to-the-thief-new-radiohead-album-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jough.com/blog/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I was wondering what was going on in the world of my favourite still-together band, Radiohead, and so I checked their web site.
Prolific lads that they are, I saw that they were cooking up yet another new album.  Sweet.
I read an entry by the band about how someone leaked an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago I was wondering what was going on in the world of my favourite still-together band, Radiohead, and so I checked their web site.</p>
<p>Prolific lads that they are, I saw that they were cooking up yet another new album.  Sweet.</p>
<p>I read an entry by the band about how someone leaked an early version of the album to the internet, and that they hoped people wouldn&#8217;t download it, and to understand that it&#8217;s not finished yet and that we wouldn&#8217;t be hearing the final album.</p>
<p>Uh-huh.  So I of course immediately fired up my Gnutella client and downloaded the album in its entirety in less than a half an hour.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel the least bit guilty.  This may be the only CD I buy this year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been listening to this now every day for about two weeks and while I wasn&#8217;t sure about it at first as I&#8217;ve gotten to live with the album for awhile it&#8217;s really grown on me.  So much so that I feel the need to post an early review.</p>
<p>So below is my review of the early-release rough-cut of the new Radiohead Album, <em>Hail to the Thief</em>.<br />
<span id="more-38"></span><br />
<b>01 2+2=5</b><br />
With a bit of static, the album opens slowly with a ticking metronome beat and a droned chorus, until about a minute and a half in when it breaks down into a nice guitar part and vocals that sound almost like liturgical music before breaking into an uptempo heavy guitar and synth parts that would be at home on their masterpiece <em>OK Computer</em>.</p>
<p>The lyrics do have the dubious distinction of including the title of the album amongst their lines.</p>
<p><b>02 sit down, stand up</b><br />
The second track slows things down again with a gentle synth, piano, and&#8230; is that xylophone?</p>
<p>The lyrics are probably the simplest on this track:</p>
<p><em>sit down, stand up<br />
walk into the jaws of hell<br />
we can wipe you out anytime</p>
<p>oh the rain drops </em></p>
<p>Someone on ateaseweb.com, who transcribed the lyrics, says that &#8220;oh the rain drops&#8221; is repeated 46 times at the end of the song.  That sounds about right.  This phrase is repeated as the rest of the orchestration goes from lush to chaotic (but not in a stupid, careless way &#8211; this is scripted chaos &#8211; carefully planned).</p>
<p>Not a bad track &#8211; the opening section/movement of this song is superiour to the final chaotic and harder-edged section.</p>
<p><b>03 sail to the moon</b><br />
There is a LOT of piano/keyboard on this album, and track 03 continues with the &#8220;start slowly then build to a big loud finish&#8221; formula of the first two tracks.</p>
<p>Except that &#8220;sail to the moon&#8221; never explodes &#8211; nor does it have a &#8220;B section&#8221; &#8211; it remains the same tempo and doesn&#8217;t deviate much throughout the track, which makes its 4:28 running time a little monotonous.  It&#8217;s a pretty song &#8211; I&#8217;m just hoping that in the time between this early version and the finished album they come up with something more to do with it.</p>
<p>Of all of the tracks, this one is the most un-finished (not production-value-wise, but composition-wise).</p>
<p><em>04 backdrifts</em><br />
And now for something that would fit right in on <em>Kid A</em> or <em>Amnesiac</em>.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t exactly a dance number, but it has a groovalicious beat but again it&#8217;s 5:31 of the same thing.  This song would be twice as strong by being half as long.</p>
<p><b>05 go to sleep</b><br />
The song which most resembles a rock song, &#8220;Go to Sleep&#8221; is one of my early favourites.  It has the best line on the album on it: &#8220;We don&#8217;t want the loonies taking over.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed.</p>
<p>I predict this would be a hit single if they release it.  It&#8217;s got a great driving beat in the verses, and the half-tempo chorus is perfect, simple, efficient.</p>
<p><b>06 where i end and you begin</b><br />
This is an easy favourite.  It&#8217;s another up-tempo number with some of the best guitar work on the album.  Musically, this is Radiohead&#8217;s finest hour.</p>
<p>It grinds to an end with singer York snarling &#8220;I will eat you alive.&#8221;  I believe him.  Good stuff.</p>
<p><b>07 we suck young blood </b><br />
This is the &#8220;Fitter, Happier&#8221; of HTTT.  It&#8217;s an immediate skip track &#8211; I can&#8217;t see gaining anything from listening to this piece of obvious filler more than once.  Maybe it won&#8217;t be on the final album.  I hope not.</p>
<p>It has a shuffling piano and hand claps (I kid you not) for percussion.  It&#8217;s close to comedy.  And the lyrics are childish and insipid.</p>
<p>It speaks well of <em>Hail to the Thief</em> that there&#8217;s only one expendable track (well, maybe two &#8211; see below).</p>
<p>Still, the album would have been better without it.  It&#8217;s a dirge, which right away turns me off, but it&#8217;s not inventive or dynamic enough to warrant more than ten seconds.</p>
<p><b>08 the gloaming</b><br />
&#8220;The Gloaming&#8221; may double as the second filler track on the album &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to tell yet.  It&#8217;s not a <em>bad</em> song, but it&#8217;s flat and simple.  Maybe it&#8217;ll grow on me.</p>
<p><b>09 there there </b><br />
The first single, again Radiohead choose the least likely track to make their first single (their last album&#8217;s first single was <em>Amnesiac&#8217;s</em> &#8220;Pyramid Song,&#8221; which is as avant-garde as Radiohead get &#8211; it&#8217;s a great piece of music, but I can&#8217;t imagine it helped sell any albums.</p>
<p>This track will fair a little better, I think.  It&#8217;s long, though, so I&#8217;d like to hear the radio edit.  The second half of the song sounds more &#8220;commercial&#8221; than the slower first half.</p>
<p><b>10 i will</b><br />
A slow, soulful number with chorus-like vocals a la the end of &#8220;Paranoid Android&#8221; from <em>OK Computer</em>.</p>
<p>At a brisk 2:24, it&#8217;s the perfect length.  Several of the other songs would benefit from the same brevity.</p>
<p><b>11 a punch-up at the wedding </b><br />
This is one of those tracks that people are either going to love or hate.  One early review listed this as the best they&#8217;ve ever done.  I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true, but it&#8217;s a solid track.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got a nice relaxed bass line, more keyboards, and keeps the same lazy tempo for most of the song.  The melding of technology and old-fashioned human playing is a perfect match on this track.</p>
<p><b>12 myxomatosis </b><br />
The most re-playable on the album, &#8220;Myxomatosis&#8221; (a rare disease that affects rabbits &#8211; it&#8217;s also a Philip Larkin poem).</p>
<p>This is the hardest edged song Radiohead&#8217;s done in several albums, with a grinding electric beat, it&#8217;s instantly infectious, just like the rabbit disease.</p>
<p>Good stuff.</p>
<p><b>13 scatterbrain </b><br />
I really disliked this song when I first heard it and it&#8217;s since grown on me considerably.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another soft song, with complex guitar work and gentle synth.  It&#8217;s the &#8220;No Surprises&#8221; of the album.</p>
<p><b>14 a wolf at the door </b><br />
This is the best song on the album &#8211; the beat and the lyrics trip all over each other &#8211; it&#8217;s a mess in progress, waiting to fall, crashing in on itself before it recovers into a difficult to sing chorus that pulls everything back together again before it almost falls apart.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ask me what the lyrics mean.</p>
<p>The guitar and strings sound like a lullaby.  Instead of ending on a big orchestrated lush explosion like the previous four albums have, this one ends on a quiet but fascinating note.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the only track that&#8217;s unlike anything that&#8217;s appeared on previous albums, and I hope it represents the future of what we can expect from Radiohead, who&#8217;ve really refined the weird avant-garde rock thing now, but have plateaued a bit with this album.</p>
<p>My hope is that the songs that I really like don&#8217;t change at all, and the songs that I thought could use some improvement change for the better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this will be one of the few things that I listen to over and over and over again for the next couple of months &#8211; but if the songs change (and many will, probably) I just hope I don&#8217;t ruin the album versions for myself by not liking them as much as the earlier version simply because they&#8217;re different.</p>
<p><em>Hail to the Thief</em> hits stores 10 June 2003 and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000092ZYX/joughcom">is available for preorder on Amazon.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jough.com/2003/04/30/hail-to-the-thief-new-radiohead-album-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imitation of Life &#8211; A &#8220;Reveal&#8221;ing look at a band on the decline.</title>
		<link>http://jough.com/2001/05/10/imitation-of-life-a-revealing-look-at-a-band-on-the-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://jough.com/2001/05/10/imitation-of-life-a-revealing-look-at-a-band-on-the-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2001 14:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jough.com/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
R.E.M.&#8217;s twelfth studio album,
Reveal, is a formulaic, banal adventure
in low-fi that, while a refreshing break from the usual
radio tripe, is playing it safe in a very comfortable,
non-threatening sandbox. That R.E.M. created the very
formula to which they now prescribe is a testament to their
greatness &#8211; that Reveal is so 
uncompromisingly dull is a testament to
Jimi Hendrix, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<name>R.E.M.</name>&#8217;s twelfth studio album,<br />
<work>Reveal</work>, is a formulaic, banal adventure<br />
in low-fi that, while a refreshing break from the usual<br />
radio tripe, is playing it safe in a very comfortable,<br />
non-threatening sandbox. That R.E.M. created the very<br />
formula to which they now prescribe is a testament to their<br />
greatness &#8211; that <work>Reveal</work> is so <a<br />
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005BL29/joughcom"><br />
<img src="http://www.jough.com/images_old/reveal.jpg" alt="R.E.M. - Reveal"<br />
style="float:left;border:0;padding:10px;" width="130"<br />
height="130" /></a>uncompromisingly dull is a testament to<br />
<name>Jimi Hendrix</name>, <name>Janis Joplin</name>, <name>Kurt Cobain</name>,<br />
and all of the<br />
rock giants who had the decency to check out before they<br />
embarrassed themselves by living out the December of their<br />
artistic life regurgitating their greatest hits, only with<br />
different titles, and <em>possibly</em> in a different<br />
key.
</p>
<p>
Am I being overly harsh? Let me tell you,<br />
true believers, it pains me to lay all of this out for you<br />
like this. <name>R.E.M.</name> is my favourite band, but listening<br />
to <work>Reveal</work> makes me ill, and a little<br />
sad.
</p>
<p><span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p>
Perhaps I am being harsh. <work>Reveal</work><br />
isn&#8217;t a <em>bad</em> album &#8211; but it&#8217;s a<br />
disappointment. I&#8217;m not an oldster who laments the<br />
R.E.M. of old, before they &#8220;cashed-in&#8221; and had huge<br />
hits. I don&#8217;t begrudge them their multi-million<br />
dollar contract with Warner Bros. For the record,<br />
their <work>New Adventures in Hi-Fi</work> is my favourite<br />
album of all time, displacing their <work>Automatic for the<br />
People</work> from that position in my own internal<br />
chart. I even liked <work>Monster</work>, when fans and<br />
critics abandoned their foray into harder rock (although,<br />
being <name>R.E.M.</name>, it wasn&#8217;t exactly a head-banger). Their<br />
previous effort, <work>Up</work>, the first album that they<br />
made without drummer <name>Bill Berry</name>, was a little flat, a<br />
little off, but was a new direction for the band.<br />
<work>Reveal</work> is a rehash of the mediocrity they<br />
established with <work>Up</work>, only a tad cheerier, and<br />
without the novelty of being the first album of the &#8220;new&#8221;<br />
<name>R.E.M.</name>
</p>
<p>
<img border="0"<br />
src="http://www.jough.com/images_old/reveal_quote.gif"<br />
alt="R.E.M. is my favourite band, but listening to Reveal makes me ill..."<br />
width="294" height="88" style="float:right;border:0;padding:10px;" /><br />
<work>Reveal</work> is actually somewhat<br />
pleasant. I can imagine playing it in the background<br />
while doing some work (as I&#8217;m doing now) and having it not<br />
be at all distracting. Do youwant a track by track run-down?<br />
That&#8217;ll unfortunately mean that I have to listen to the<br />
album again, but of course you know that I always suffer<br />
for you.
</p>
<p>
The album opens with some interesting synth work<br />
that shows promise, but by the middle of &#8220;The Lifting&#8221; my<br />
hopes already started sinking. It&#8217;s actually one of<br />
the better openers to an <name>R.E.M.</name> album in recent history,<br />
but it stays on the same level that it started, never going<br />
anywhere. The first track is emblematic of the whole<br />
album &#8211; it&#8217;s a journey without a<br />
destination.
</p>
<p>
The second track, &#8220;I&#8217;ve Been High,&#8221; is another<br />
snooze-fest, lacking any change in dynamics (or any<br />
discernible melody &#8211; besides the now-usual &#8220;talk-sing&#8221;<br />
drone that singer Stipe seems to have developed in recent<br />
years).
</p>
<p>
I was heartened that the third track, &#8220;Reno,&#8221;<br />
sounded a lot like the first track from <work>Hi-Fi</work> (as<br />
I affectionately abbreviate my favourite album), &#8220;How the<br />
West Was Won and Where it Got Us&#8221; but with a loungier<br />
vibe. Unfortunately, like the sketch writers at<br />
<name>Saturday Night Live</name>, they don&#8217;t know when the song<br />
should end, and &#8220;Reno&#8221; goes on for a minute or two too<br />
long. Pity. &#8220;She Just Wants&#8221; has lifeless<br />
verses that actually outshine the even deader and more<br />
repetitive chorus.
</p>
<p>
I actually rather like the fifth track,<br />
&#8220;Disappear.&#8221; It sounds like something that you might<br />
find on their highly superiour debut,<br />
<work>Murmur</work>. Of course, if I want to hear songs<br />
that sound like <work>Murmur</work> I&#8217;ll just listen to<br />
<work>Murmur</work>. The next track &#8220;Saturn Returns&#8221; is<br />
also a welcome change &#8211; sung in &#8220;Tongue&#8221; falsetto, the<br />
verses pull against the sparse piano and ambient guitar<br />
noise via the barely audible <name>Peter Buck</name>.<br />
<name>Mike Mills</name><br />
shines like a happy person on this entire album, showing<br />
that the bassist is a genius at keyboard layering and<br />
arrangement. Still, <name>R.E.M.</name> have never been known for their<br />
instrumental virtuosity, but rather their song-writing, and<br />
even Mills&#8217;s flashes of brilliance on <work>Reveal</work> don&#8217;t<br />
make up for the general flatness of the compositions.<br />
Maybe it&#8217;s time for a <name>Mike Mills</name> solo album.
</p>
<p>
<name>Michael Stipe</name> is what he is. He&#8217;s at his<br />
most Stipe-iness here. His lyrics have actually been<br />
improving with each album, even if his singing has remained<br />
as pubescently angsty as always. &#8220;All I Want&#8221; is the<br />
follow-up to <work>Up</work>&#8217;s &#8220;At My Most Beautiful,&#8221; although<br />
without the gorgeous arrangement and freshness of the<br />
latter. <name>R.E.M.</name> have listed <name>Brian Wilson</name> and the <name>Beach<br />
Boys</name> as an inspiration, but we&#8217;d do best to skip the<br />
imitators and go straight for the source. Thwack<br />
<work>Pet Sounds</work> onto your turntable (I know people<br />
don&#8217;t really use turntables anymore, but it&#8217;s hard to<br />
&#8220;thwack&#8221; something into a CD player) and kick back for a<br />
more enjoyable listening experience.
</p>
<p>
The first single, &#8220;Imitation of Life,&#8221; is the<br />
bastard step-child to their previous single, &#8220;The Great<br />
Beyond,&#8221; a song that the band recorded for the <work>Man on<br />
the Moon</work> soundtrack (which incidentally was better<br />
than anything on <work>Up</work>, and a good omen of things to<br />
come, even if our expectations have been let down by<br />
<work>Reveal</work>). &#8220;Imitation&#8221; is the only upbeat song<br />
on the album, and would be a listenable filler-track on<br />
other <name>R.E.M.</name> albums. On <work>Reveal</work>, it&#8217;s a<br />
highlight.
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Summer Turns to High&#8221; is another<br />
Wilson-fest. &#8220;Chorus &amp; the Ring&#8221; is another<br />
tune-less dirge whose only contribution to the album is to<br />
offer guilt-free skippage, thus shortening the album&#8217;s<br />
playing time by four and a half minutes. &#8220;I&#8217;ll Take<br />
the Rain&#8221; is another jangly melody-less dirge. The<br />
closing track, &#8220;Beachball&#8221; starts off promisingly enough,<br />
but the Herb Alpert style horns are just fancy<br />
windowdressing for another dirgefest. It&#8217;s not a bad<br />
album. It&#8217;s just bland.
</p>
<p>
When <name>Bill Berry</name> left the band (as well as<br />
producer <name>Scott Litt</name>, who may have been a more creative<br />
force behind the band&#8217;s <name>Warner Bros.</name> years than I<br />
realised), the band ceased to be the <name>R.E.M.</name> of old and<br />
became something else. That&#8217;s fine by me. I&#8217;m<br />
glad that they didn&#8217;t simply crank out more <work>Out of<br />
Time</work>s after their unlikely hit &#8220;Losing My Religion&#8221;<br />
propelled them from college-rock obscurity to stadium<br />
stardom. But are they now going to release<br />
<work>Up</work> over and over again? <work>Reveal</work><br />
reveals that the answer is yes. Let&#8217;s hope that the<br />
next three remaining albums on their contract don&#8217;t make<br />
daysleepers of us all.
</p>
<p>
Don&#8217;t believe me? <a<br />
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005BL29/joughcom"<br />
title="Buy this album from Amazon.com"><br />
Buy a copy from Amazon.com</a> and hear<br />
for yourself. Or better yet, <a<br />
href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000002N9S/joughcom"<br />
title="Buy this album from Amazon.com"><br />
buy a copy of <work>New Adventures in<br />
Hi-Fi</work></a> and treat yourself to an <name>R.E.M.</name><br />
with a pulse.
</p>
<p>
<em>Reveal hits the streets Tuesday, 15 May 2001.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jough.com/2001/05/10/imitation-of-life-a-revealing-look-at-a-band-on-the-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
